Bank of America Q1 EPS Beats by $0.02, Revenue Rises 12.3% YoY
In its January 14th quarter, Bank of America posted $0.98 EPS on $28.53 billion revenue, beating consensus by $0.02 and $0.8 billion respectively and driving 12.3% year-over-year revenue growth. JPMorgan and Citi lifted price targets to $61 and $62, raising the average analyst target to $59.74.
1. Q4 Earnings Beat Expectations
Bank of America reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.98, beating the consensus estimate of $0.96 by $0.02. Revenue for the period reached $28.53 billion, topping Wall Street forecasts of $27.73 billion and marking a 12.3% year-over-year increase. The bank delivered a return on equity of 11.07% and a net profit margin of 16.23%, reflecting steady improvements in both loan growth and cost control as interest rates remained elevated.
2. Dividend Maintained at Attractive Yield
In December, the firm paid a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share, representing an annualized payout of $1.12 and a yield of 2.1%. The dividend payout ratio stands at 29.24%, comfortably below the peer-group average, underscoring management’s commitment to returning capital while preserving balance-sheet flexibility amid ongoing funding cost pressures.
3. Wall Street Analysts Lift Ratings and Targets
Over the past four months, five major research houses have revised their opinions on Bank of America. Erste Group upgraded to a Buy rating in early October, JPMorgan raised its target by $3 in January, Deutsche Bank boosted its outlook by $2 in September, HSBC moved to Buy with a $50 target in early January, and Citigroup increased its objective by $4 in mid-October. Collectively, analysts now report an average Moderate Buy consensus with an implied share target near $59.74, reflecting expectations for continued net interest income growth in 2026.
4. Congressional Insider Sale Disclosed
Representative Julie Johnson of Texas disclosed a sale of Bank of America shares valued between $1,001 and $15,000 on December 18, 2025, executed through her Chase Brokerage Account. This transaction was part of a broader set of divestitures on the same date, covering a basket of blue-chip financials, industrials and consumer staples, and highlights ongoing scrutiny of legislative insider activity in financial sector names.