California-led states sue to block Paramount’s $110 billion Warner Bros Discovery deal

Paramount has said the deal will allow it to produce more, not less, after it cuts $6 billion in redundant infrastructure, marketing and corporate jobs. Ellison has vowed that the combined film studios would release 30 movies a year. The states called that commitment unenforceable, and said that even if the company stuck to that promise, it would still be in a position to raise prices and decrease quality after the merger. They said the merger would ripple through the states' economies, harming tens of thousands of writers, actors, film crews and others. Paramount shares closed up 1.5%, and Warner Bros shares rose 1.9%. It will likely take months for a ruling on the states' claims, causing a delay that could rack up hundreds of millions of dollars in costs for Paramount. The states have asked Paramount to delay closing the deal until the legal process concludes. Otherwise, the states said, they will seek an order keeping the deal from closing. “This is a major setback and arguably the most credible threat yet to Paramount’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery," said Paolo Pescatore, analyst at PP Foresight. Delays will be costly, even if Paramount ultimately wins, he said. Paramount has committed to pay around $650 million in fees to Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders each quarter if the deal does not close before October. The company has said delays could force it to renegotiate the deal's financing, cause uncertainty for its stock price, or even scuttle the transaction altogether. Similar cases in recent years have taken an average of eight months for a judge to reach a determination, a Reuters review of recent federal merger cases found. Critics of the deal have said Paramount's political connections smoothed the path to clearance last month by the U.S. Department of Justice. Paramount CEO David Ellison's father, billionaire Oracle ORCL.N co-founder Larry Ellison, has cultivated ties with Republican President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, all of the state attorneys general involved in the lawsuit are Democrats. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said, “despite the federal regulators rubber-stamping this bad deal, we’re stepping up to protect families, small businesses, and Oregon’s film industry.” For some Democrats, antitrust has also become a way to combat the Trump administration when they think it is allowing corporations to leverage their influence. Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Washington also joined the lawsuit. "Trump is pro-rigged economy," Bonta said at a press conference on Monday, citing major antitrust cases the DOJ has resolved, including a case against concert company Live Nation LYV.N. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Antitrust enforcement has also been used to combat the issues vexing voters the most in recent years, with U.S. political leaders leveraging competition law to harness frustration with the soaring cost of living and to address widespread negative sentiment towards big business. The Paramount deal is no different. Hollywood workers slammed the deal, fearing it would hurt jobs. Theater owners opposed it, worrying it would result in fewer films. If allowed to move forward with the deal, Paramount would control 27% of the distribution market for films that appear on screens across America, 30% of blockbuster film distribution and 27% of the market for basic cable channels, the states said. Paramount and Warner Bros compete for the best release dates and screens at thousands of movie theaters across the country, the states said. Without that competition, theaters and moviegoers could face higher prices, the states argued. Similarly, pay TV distributors and their subscribers rely on competition between the two companies, which together would control major channels such as CNN, MTV, HGTV, Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon. California and 11 states sued to block Paramount's PSKY.O $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery WBD.O, alleging the deal would create a media behemoth with the power to raise prices in film and television. The [lawsuit](https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmwaranvr/PSKY%20lawsuit.pdf) filed in Oakland federal court threatens to derail Paramount CEO David Ellison's bid to transform his company into a major rival of Netflix NFLX.O and Disney DIS.N. States including New York, Arizona and Minnesota argued the deal would harm theaters and television distributors, raising prices for consumers and making wages less competitive for workers. "After this merger, for every dollar generated by wide-release theatrical films and basic cable channels in this country, the combined company will pocket more than a quarter," the states said in the lawsuit, adding, "This merger, in short, would create a media behemoth." Paramount said the lawsuit distorts settled antitrust law and is based on a misrepresentation of competition in the entertainment industry.

California-led states sue to block Paramount’s $110 billion Warner Bros Discovery deal

Delay could add costs for Paramount

Politics and antitrust concerns surround the challenge

States file antitrust lawsuit over Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery deal

Related News

Trading Day-Blockades are back

Tavia Acquisition signs LOI to merge with Vita Inclinata in deal valuing Vita at USD 450 million

Silver Lake Partners IV disposes of USD 30.76 million in Dell common shares

Satellogic sales VP Mark Carmichael speaks on “Commercial Space Reckoning” panel at Farnborough Airshow

Healthy Extracts says Chief Brand Officer Aaron Hefter resigns