McDonald’s Hit With Class-Action Lawsuit Alleging McRib Contains No Real Rib Meat
McDonald’s faces a class-action lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois alleging its McRib sandwich contains no actual rib meat and is made from ground pork shoulder, heart, tripe and other low-grade parts. McDonald’s denies the allegations, stating the McRib uses 100% seasoned boneless pork without offal or fillers.
1. Analyst Revises Outlook on McDonald’s
On January 6, 2026, Oppenheimer analyst Brian Bittner raised his long-term outlook for McDonald’s, assigning a new target that corresponds to an approximate 17.25% upside from recent levels. The upgrade reflects confidence in the company’s ability to sustain mid-single-digit system-wide sales growth across North America and key international markets, driven by menu innovation and digital ordering expansion. Trading activity on the New York Stock Exchange averaged 3,739,677 shares on the day of the report, underscoring strong institutional interest. In 2025, McDonald’s contributed to Rose’s Income Garden portfolio with a total return of 12.97%, powered by its forward dividend yield of 6.29% and a 6.8% increase in its annual payout. Bittner highlighted margin expansion potential through optimized supply chains and ongoing restaurant modernization efforts, projecting a return on invested capital above 20% over the next three years.
2. Class-Action Lawsuit Challenges McRib Composition
McDonald’s is facing a proposed class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the popular McRib sandwich contains no actual rib meat. Filed by four plaintiffs, the suit argues that the name and shape of the McRib mislead consumers, who expect a product made from pork rib cuts. The complaint points to the use of ground-pork blends rather than rib meat and claims this amounts to deceptive marketing. McDonald’s has publicly rejected the allegations, stating that its McRib patty is made from 100% boneless pork sourced from approved U.S. suppliers and that all ingredients are fully disclosed. The case could prompt closer regulatory scrutiny of product labeling practices across the quick-service industry, particularly for limited-time offerings with nostalgic brand appeal.