Economists and some former central bankers agree turning an eye toward M2 might help with longer-run inflation trend spotting at a time when the Fed has been wrestling with five years of inflation above its 2% target.
That price pressure surge, subsequently exacerbated by President Donald Trump’s economic and foreign policy agenda, was rooted in aggressive stimulus efforts during the pandemic. Rising M2 did in fact hint at enduring inflation pressures that at the time had been dismissed as temporary.
“I do think it's good to remind everybody that monetary policy is ultimately about money," said James Bullard, dean of the Mitch Daniels School of Business at Purdue University and former leader of the St. Louis Fed, which has a long association with monetarism.
“We understand that money growth might move around” and should be viewed with some caution, “but if (money supply measures) got really serious in one direction or another, maybe that's something you should pay attention to,” Bullard said.
Wall Street has also taken note.
“Although the velocity of money can be highly unstable, we find that excess money supply has been positively correlated with inflation over recent decades, particularly during periods of fast excess money growth,” Deutsche Bank economists said in a new report. At the same time, they cautioned against too great a reliance on it for policymaking, which jibes with Warsh’s view that it should simply be part of policymakers' mix of data to watch.
The focus Warsh has brought to money supply may even have opened the mind of former Fed Governor Stephen Miran — an uber-dove who had to vacate the Fed board to open a seat for Warsh — to a hawkish policy outlook.
Right now, "most monetary aggregates do not suggest recent high inflation will prove persistent, and it may be inappropriate to attribute recent quarters' high inflation to excessive money growth,” a recent paper Miran co-authored for Hudson Bay Capital said. But, “If money growth begins to accelerate from current levels, it would suggest tighter monetary policy is appropriate.”
That's an eye-opening shift for the former Trump economic adviser, who in his short tenure at the Fed argued for aggressive interest rate cuts despite above-target inflation, dissenting in favor of easier policy at each of the six policy meetings he attended.