NY judge tosses Uber lawsuit claiming lawyers inflated injury claims

Lawyers for the defendant law firms — Wingate, Russotti, Shapiro, Moses & Halperin, Banilov & Associates and the Lavelle Law Firm — did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The firms had denied Uber's claims.

A spokesperson for Uber did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In addition to ruling that Uber failed to plausibly allege RICO violations, the judge found that Uber could not yet show it suffered any harm, because in the five injury cases it cited in its July 2025 amended complaint, three are still pending in New York state court.

"It cannot yet be determined whether Uber will prevail in the pending cases, nor what remedies may be available to it to reduce its costs, such as seeking costs or sanctions through cross-claims and counterclaims," Merchant said.

The judge also dismissed Uber's claims in the case against a group of doctors and individual lawyers.

The case is one of at least four Uber has filed in the last two years invoking civil RICO provisions against lawyers in U.S. federal courts. Civil plaintiffs can have their damages tripled under RICO; Uber did not specify its damages in its amended complaint.

The other three cases, targeting law firms and doctors in Los Angeles, Miami and Philadelphia, are still pending.

Aug. 17 (Reuters) - Uber has hit a roadblock in a series of lawsuits it lodged against personal injury lawyers in four U.S. states, after a judge dismissed its case against three law firms in New York.

Uber alleged the firms violated the federal anti-racketeering law known as RICO by conspiring with doctors to bring cases against the rideshare giant with exaggerated or fabricated injury claims in order to extract inflated payouts.