US yield curve sends stark warning - consumers can’t handle rate hikes: McGeever

ORLANDO, Florida, Sept 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. bond market rout cranked up a gear last week, amid sticky inflation and firming expectations of a Federal Reserve rate hike, sending yields surging to multi-year highs. This grabbed the headlines, but the more telling story may be the shape of the yield curve. The signals being sent by the relative moves between short- and longer-dated U.S. borrowing costs suggest bond investors are already looking beyond the inflation-fighting rate hikes likely coming down the pike and bracing for the economic slowdown that could follow. The gap between two- and 30-year yields shrank on Friday to 71 basis points, the narrowest since late June. Shave off a few more basis points, and this will be the flattest curve since March last year. The benchmark “2s/10s curve”, the gap between two- and 10-year yields, also shrank on Friday. It hit 31 basis points, the tightest spread since July 29. That's a significant marker — it was the day of the Fed's last policy decision and, most notably, Chair Kevin Warsh's poorly received press conference when he offered only an equivocal commitment to the Fed's 2% inflation target. The yield curve steepened the most in a year that day, as investors bet that the Fed would fall further behind the curve and allow inflation to drift even higher. Friday's move was in the opposite direction. Traders are now betting that the elevated inflation numbers — and Warsh's credibility concerns — will force the central bank to start a tightening cycle this week that could entail four quarter-percentage-point rate hikes within a year. The yield curve flattening implies that the Fed will soon have to reverse course and loosen policy due to doubts about the economy's ability to cope with the rise in the cost of money. Or, perhaps more specifically, consumers' ability to handle it. But there's a counterforce to these consumer headwinds that could cause the yield curve to reverse course and steepen yet again. Taken together, the fiscal whoosh from Washington and the massive artificial intelligence build-out, are running into the trillions of dollars, with significant inflationary — and growth — implications. The Trump administration has made no secret of its desire to run the economy hot. Its policies on immigration, energy, defense, trade, and the deficit all appear to be inflationary in the near term. Similarly, the historic wave of AI-related borrowing and investment is inflationary, although AI optimists believe it will eventually morph into a productivity boom that will ultimately be disinflationary. That may or may not transpire. Right now, AI investment is an inflationary force, and it's a big one. Skanda Amarnath, co-founder and executive director of Employ America, estimates that around one third of the overshoot in inflation is down to AI. This is why nominal growth is still so strong despite the many headwinds. Current annual nominal GDP growth of 6.6% is the highest since 2005, excluding the post-pandemic period, according to Deutsche Bank economists. Since 1990, excluding pandemic-related distortions, nominal growth has been higher in only six quarters. The recent rumblings in the AI world about the need to slow model development for safety reasons could signal that the AI investment tailwind may weaken, but at this stage, that remains a big “if.” Either way, bond investors appear to be bracing for what lies beyond this boom. Will it be bust? Watch the yield curve. Last week was marked by several key milestones for the U.S. consumer, none of them positive. U.S. crude oil rose back above $100 a barrel, while the average price of diesel scaled $6 a gallon for the first time ever. Meanwhile, the 10-year Treasury yield's US10YT=RR flirtation with 5% helped push mortgage rates to the highest since May last year. The average 30-year mortgage rate is now back above 7%, according to Mortgage News Daily. These are big, round numbers, and it's difficult to envisage a scenario where they don't put the squeeze on consumer spending, which – as a reminder – accounts for around 70% of all U.S. economic activity. True, the economy is far less oil-intensive than it used to be, which helps to explain why this year’s 80% price spike in crude hasn’t had a bigger economic impact. Energy spending accounted for 5.7% of disposable consumer income in 2024, compared with nearly 10% in the 1980s, according to the American Petroleum Institute. And energy represents around 5.5% of GDP, nearly half its share in 2008, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. But soaring gasoline, diesel and fuel prices will still eat into discretionary spending. A weak housing market could have an even bigger economic impact. Its footprint represented nearly 16% of GDP in the second quarter across the whole sector, which includes construction, home improvements, rents, and fees. House price growth is already sluggish, and 7% mortgage rates aren't going to turn that around. Although President Donald Trump has often downplayed inflation and affordability issues, he may now be tuning into voters' number-one concern going into the midterm elections. Last week, he pledged to give every adult in the country $5,000 if Republicans win both houses of Congress in November.

US yield curve sends stark warning - consumers can’t handle rate hikes: McGeever

Yield curve signals slowdown concerns

Inflationary forces could steepen the curve

Consumer pressure from energy and housing costs

Related News

British Petroleum Introduces United Steelworkers Local 7-1 To Their New Lead Negotiator

Enova slides after pulling out of Grasshopper Bancorp acquisition

Global Markets-Stocks fall as oil and bond yields rise

Payoneer holds special shareholder meeting on Nuvei merger vote

US oil export ban unlikely to lower energy prices, Interior secretary says